Little Walter: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.7%z 4.73 - 2
82.1%z 4.19 - 3
81%z 4.10 - 4
80.5%z 4.06 - 5
62.3%z 3.82 - 6
59.6%z 3.79 - 7
55.6%z 3.75 - 8
46.7%z 3.58 - 9
45.8%z 3.52 - 10
43.1%z 3.35 - 11
42.9%z 3.34 - 12
42.8%z 3.33 - 13
40.9%z 3.21 - 14
40%z 3.15 - 15
39.9%z 3.14 - 16
39.8%z 3.13 - 17
39.1%z 3.09 - 18
38.9%z 3.08 - 19
38.4%z 3.04 - 20
38%z 3.02 - 21
37.2%z 2.96 - 22
36.4%z 2.92 - 23
36.4%z 2.91 - 24
36.2%z 2.90 - 25
35.6%z 2.86 - 26
35.4%z 2.85 - 27
35.1%z 2.83 - 28
35%z 2.83 - 29
34.8%z 2.81 - 3034.8%z 2.81
- 31
34.8%z 2.81 - 32
34.6%z 2.80 - 33
34.5%z 2.79 - 34
34.4%z 2.79 - 35
34.2%z 2.78 - 36
34.1%z 2.77 - 37
34%z 2.76 - 38
33.9%z 2.75 - 39
33.9%z 2.75 - 40
33.8%z 2.75 - 41
33.5%z 2.73 - 42
33.4%z 2.72 - 43
33.4%z 2.72 - 44
33.3%z 2.72 - 45
33.3%z 2.71 - 46
33.1%z 2.70 - 47
33%z 2.70 - 48
33%z 2.69 - 49
32.9%z 2.69 - 50
32.9%z 2.69