Ludger Beerbaum: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.5%z 4.63 - 2
82.4%z 4.22 - 3
81.8%z 4.16 - 4
80.2%z 4.03 - 5
80.1%z 4.02 - 6
66.9%z 3.87 - 7
66.1%z 3.86 - 8
54.1%z 3.73 - 9
46.8%z 3.59 - 10
46.2%z 3.55 - 11
45.6%z 3.51 - 12
45.2%z 3.48 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
42.9%z 3.34 - 15
42.6%z 3.32 - 16
42.1%z 3.29 - 17
41.9%z 3.27 - 18
41.5%z 3.24 - 19
41.4%z 3.24 - 20
41%z 3.21 - 21
39.6%z 3.12 - 22
39.5%z 3.12 - 23
39.4%z 3.11 - 24
39.2%z 3.10 - 25
39.2%z 3.10 - 26
39.1%z 3.09 - 27
38.6%z 3.06 - 28
38.5%z 3.05 - 29
38.3%z 3.04 - 30
38%z 3.02 - 31
37.5%z 2.99 - 32
37.5%z 2.99 - 33
37.4%z 2.98 - 34
37.1%z 2.96 - 35
36.8%z 2.94 - 36
36.8%z 2.94 - 37
36.7%z 2.93 - 38
36.6%z 2.93 - 39
36.5%z 2.92 - 40
36.4%z 2.92 - 41
36.2%z 2.90 - 42
36%z 2.89 - 43
35.9%z 2.88 - 44
35.9%z 2.88 - 45
35.8%z 2.88 - 46
35.8%z 2.87 - 47
35.6%z 2.86 - 48
35.2%z 2.84 - 49
35.2%z 2.84 - 50
35.2%z 2.83