Luther Strange: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.7%z 4.16 - 2
75.2%z 3.96 - 3
72.2%z 3.93 - 4
67%z 3.87 - 5
53.7%z 3.73 - 6
48.9%z 3.68 - 7
47%z 3.60 - 8
46.9%z 3.60 - 9
46.7%z 3.58 - 10
46.2%z 3.55 - 11
45.7%z 3.52 - 12
45.7%z 3.52 - 13
45.2%z 3.48 - 14
45%z 3.47 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
43.9%z 3.40 - 17
43.6%z 3.38 - 18
43.5%z 3.38 - 19
43.3%z 3.36 - 20
42.8%z 3.33 - 21
42.6%z 3.32 - 22
42.4%z 3.30 - 23
42.2%z 3.29 - 24
41.7%z 3.26 - 25
41.6%z 3.25 - 26
41.4%z 3.24 - 27
41.3%z 3.23 - 28
41.2%z 3.22 - 29
40.5%z 3.18 - 30
40.5%z 3.18 - 31
40.4%z 3.17 - 32
40.3%z 3.16 - 33
40.2%z 3.16 - 34
40%z 3.15 - 35
39.8%z 3.14 - 36
39.8%z 3.13 - 37
39.5%z 3.12 - 38
39.3%z 3.10 - 39
39.3%z 3.10 - 40
39.2%z 3.10 - 41
38.9%z 3.07 - 42
38.5%z 3.05 - 43
38.3%z 3.04 - 44
38.1%z 3.03 - 45
37.8%z 3.00 - 46
37.6%z 2.99 - 47
37.4%z 2.98 - 48
37.4%z 2.98 - 49
37.3%z 2.97 - 50
37.3%z 2.97