Mandy Haberman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.4%z 4.78 - 2
72%z 3.93 - 3
54.2%z 3.73 - 4
52.9%z 3.72 - 5
47.2%z 3.61 - 6
45.5%z 3.50 - 7
44.7%z 3.45 - 8
44.5%z 3.44 - 9
44.3%z 3.42 - 10
43.6%z 3.38 - 11
43.4%z 3.37 - 12
43.4%z 3.37 - 13
43.1%z 3.35 - 14
42.8%z 3.33 - 15
42.8%z 3.33 - 16
42.3%z 3.30 - 17
42.3%z 3.30 - 18
41.6%z 3.25 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.4%z 3.24 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
41%z 3.21 - 23
40.9%z 3.21 - 24
40.7%z 3.20 - 25
40.2%z 3.16 - 26
40%z 3.15 - 27
39.8%z 3.13 - 28
39.7%z 3.13 - 29
39.7%z 3.13 - 30
39.6%z 3.12 - 31
39.4%z 3.11 - 32
39.4%z 3.11 - 33
39.4%z 3.11 - 34
38.2%z 3.03 - 35
38.2%z 3.03 - 36
38.1%z 3.02 - 37
38%z 3.02 - 38
37.7%z 3.00 - 39
37.7%z 3.00 - 40
37.6%z 2.99 - 41
37.5%z 2.99 - 42
37.4%z 2.98 - 43
37.4%z 2.98 - 44
37.2%z 2.97 - 45
37%z 2.96 - 46
36.8%z 2.94 - 47
36.8%z 2.94 - 48
36.8%z 2.94 - 49
36.8%z 2.94 - 50
36.4%z 2.92