Mark Canterbury: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.7%z 4.15 - 2
80.8%z 4.08 - 3
75.1%z 3.96 - 4
71%z 3.92 - 5
68.8%z 3.89 - 6
60.7%z 3.81 - 7
55%z 3.74 - 8
49.2%z 3.68 - 9
47.6%z 3.64 - 10
47.5%z 3.64 - 11
47%z 3.60 - 12
46.5%z 3.57 - 13
45.8%z 3.52 - 14
45.1%z 3.48 - 15
44.7%z 3.46 - 16
44.5%z 3.44 - 17
44.3%z 3.42 - 18
44.2%z 3.42 - 19
44.1%z 3.41 - 20
44.1%z 3.41 - 21
43.9%z 3.40 - 22
43.8%z 3.39 - 23
43.5%z 3.37 - 24
43.4%z 3.37 - 25
43.2%z 3.35 - 26
42.5%z 3.31 - 27
42.4%z 3.31 - 28
42.4%z 3.30 - 29
42.2%z 3.29 - 30
42.2%z 3.29 - 31
41.7%z 3.26 - 32
41.5%z 3.25 - 33
41.5%z 3.25 - 34
41.4%z 3.24 - 35
41.2%z 3.22 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
41%z 3.21 - 38
40.9%z 3.21 - 39
40.9%z 3.21 - 40
40.8%z 3.20 - 41
39.8%z 3.13 - 42
39.7%z 3.13 - 43
39.3%z 3.11 - 44
39.3%z 3.10 - 45
39%z 3.08 - 46
38.7%z 3.06 - 47
38.4%z 3.05 - 48
38.4%z 3.04 - 49
38.3%z 3.04 - 50
38.3%z 3.04