Mathew Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
76%z 3.97 - 2
71.7%z 3.93 - 3
69.5%z 3.90 - 4
53.5%z 3.73 - 5
50%z 3.69 - 6
49.5%z 3.68 - 7
48.3%z 3.67 - 8
47.5%z 3.63 - 9
47.3%z 3.62 - 10
46.8%z 3.59 - 11
46.3%z 3.55 - 12
46%z 3.54 - 13
45.9%z 3.53 - 14
45.7%z 3.52 - 15
44.5%z 3.44 - 16
43.9%z 3.40 - 17
43.2%z 3.35 - 18
42.9%z 3.33 - 19
42.4%z 3.30 - 20
41.7%z 3.26 - 21
41.6%z 3.25 - 22
41.4%z 3.24 - 23
41.3%z 3.23 - 24
40.6%z 3.19 - 25
40.6%z 3.19 - 26
40.5%z 3.18 - 27
40.5%z 3.18 - 28
40.2%z 3.16 - 29
40.1%z 3.15 - 30
39.8%z 3.14 - 31
39.6%z 3.12 - 32
39.4%z 3.11 - 33
38.8%z 3.07 - 34
38.6%z 3.06 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.5%z 3.05 - 37
38.1%z 3.03 - 38
37.9%z 3.01 - 39
37.9%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.01 - 41
37.8%z 3.00 - 42
37.6%z 2.99 - 43
37.5%z 2.99 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.5%z 2.98 - 46
37.4%z 2.98 - 47
37.3%z 2.97 - 48
37.1%z 2.96 - 49
36.9%z 2.95 - 50
36.8%z 2.94