Matthew Garber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.1%z 5.04 - 2
80.7%z 4.07 - 3
76.6%z 3.98 - 4
70.5%z 3.91 - 5
70%z 3.91 - 6
55.5%z 3.75 - 7
50.9%z 3.70 - 8
49.7%z 3.69 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
46.4%z 3.56 - 11
46.2%z 3.55 - 12
45.6%z 3.51 - 13
45.6%z 3.51 - 14
45.4%z 3.50 - 15
44.5%z 3.44 - 16
44.4%z 3.43 - 17
44.3%z 3.42 - 18
44.2%z 3.42 - 19
44.1%z 3.41 - 20
43.8%z 3.39 - 21
43.8%z 3.39 - 22
43.5%z 3.37 - 23
43.3%z 3.36 - 24
43.3%z 3.36 - 25
43%z 3.34 - 26
42.5%z 3.31 - 27
42.4%z 3.30 - 28
42.2%z 3.29 - 29
42.2%z 3.29 - 30
41.9%z 3.27 - 31
41.8%z 3.26 - 32
41.4%z 3.24 - 33
41.4%z 3.24 - 34
40.8%z 3.20 - 35
40.7%z 3.20 - 36
40.4%z 3.17 - 37
40.4%z 3.17 - 38
40.2%z 3.16 - 39
40.1%z 3.16 - 40
40.1%z 3.15 - 41
39.9%z 3.14 - 42
39.7%z 3.13 - 43
39.6%z 3.12 - 44
39.5%z 3.12 - 45
39.3%z 3.10 - 46
39.3%z 3.10 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
39%z 3.09 - 49
38.8%z 3.07 - 50
38.2%z 3.03