Michael Lumb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.3%z 4.61 - 2
80.7%z 4.07 - 3
57.9%z 3.77 - 4
51.2%z 3.70 - 5
47%z 3.60 - 6
46.6%z 3.57 - 7
46.4%z 3.56 - 8
46.1%z 3.54 - 9
44.9%z 3.46 - 10
44.2%z 3.42 - 11
44.1%z 3.41 - 12
44%z 3.41 - 13
44%z 3.40 - 14
43.2%z 3.36 - 15
42.9%z 3.34 - 16
42.5%z 3.31 - 17
42.4%z 3.31 - 18
42.2%z 3.29 - 19
41.5%z 3.25 - 20
41.3%z 3.23 - 21
41.2%z 3.23 - 22
41.1%z 3.22 - 23
40%z 3.15 - 24
40%z 3.15 - 25
39.9%z 3.14 - 26
39.8%z 3.13 - 27
38.9%z 3.08 - 28
38.5%z 3.05 - 29
38.4%z 3.04 - 30
38.3%z 3.04 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
38.2%z 3.03 - 33
38.2%z 3.03 - 34
38.1%z 3.03 - 35
38%z 3.02 - 36
37.8%z 3.01 - 37
37.7%z 3.00 - 38
37.1%z 2.96 - 39
37%z 2.96 - 40
36.9%z 2.95 - 41
36.5%z 2.92 - 42
36.4%z 2.92 - 43
36.3%z 2.91 - 44
36.3%z 2.91 - 45
36.1%z 2.90 - 46
36%z 2.89 - 47
35.8%z 2.87 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.4%z 2.85 - 50
35.3%z 2.85