Mink Stole: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.9%z 5.01 - 2
86.2%z 4.53 - 3
80.7%z 4.08 - 4
56.4%z 3.76 - 5
51.5%z 3.70 - 6
51.4%z 3.70 - 7
47.2%z 3.61 - 8
47.2%z 3.61 - 9
46.8%z 3.59 - 10
45.9%z 3.53 - 11
45.8%z 3.52 - 12
45.7%z 3.52 - 13
45.6%z 3.51 - 14
45.5%z 3.51 - 15
45.5%z 3.50 - 16
45.1%z 3.48 - 17
44.8%z 3.46 - 18
44.8%z 3.46 - 19
44.7%z 3.45 - 20
44.4%z 3.44 - 21
44.3%z 3.42 - 22
44.2%z 3.42 - 23
44%z 3.41 - 24
43.9%z 3.40 - 25
43.5%z 3.37 - 26
43.2%z 3.36 - 27
42.7%z 3.32 - 28
42.6%z 3.31 - 29
42.5%z 3.31 - 30
42.4%z 3.30 - 31
42.1%z 3.29 - 32
42%z 3.28 - 33
41.9%z 3.27 - 34
41.9%z 3.27 - 35
41.3%z 3.23 - 3641.3%z 3.23
- 37
41.1%z 3.22 - 38
41.1%z 3.22 - 39
41.1%z 3.22 - 40
41%z 3.21 - 41
41%z 3.21 - 42
40.9%z 3.21 - 43
40.6%z 3.19 - 44
40.5%z 3.18 - 45
40.3%z 3.17 - 46
40.3%z 3.17 - 47
40.2%z 3.16 - 48
40.2%z 3.16 - 49
40.1%z 3.16 - 50
40.1%z 3.15