Moa Gammel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
96.7%z 6.09 - 2
90.4%z 4.91 - 3
87.3%z 4.61 - 4
86.3%z 4.53 - 5
82.7%z 4.23 - 6
82.4%z 4.21 - 7
81.2%z 4.11 - 8
80.8%z 4.09 - 9
78.8%z 4.00 - 10
76.1%z 3.97 - 11
76%z 3.97 - 12
74.8%z 3.96 - 13
71.4%z 3.92 - 14
69.9%z 3.91 - 15
69%z 3.90 - 16
63.7%z 3.84 - 17
58.7%z 3.78 - 18
57.9%z 3.77 - 19
56.5%z 3.76 - 20
53.2%z 3.72 - 21
49.4%z 3.68 - 22
48.9%z 3.68 - 23
48%z 3.66 - 24
47.6%z 3.64 - 25
47.5%z 3.63 - 26
46.8%z 3.59 - 27
46.5%z 3.57 - 28
46.4%z 3.56 - 29
46.1%z 3.54 - 30
46%z 3.54 - 31
45.6%z 3.51 - 32
45.6%z 3.51 - 33
45.5%z 3.50 - 34
45.4%z 3.50 - 35
45.3%z 3.49 - 36
45.3%z 3.49 - 37
45.1%z 3.48 - 38
44.9%z 3.46 - 39
44.2%z 3.42 - 40
44.2%z 3.42 - 41
44.1%z 3.42 - 42
43.8%z 3.40 - 43
43.8%z 3.39 - 44
43.7%z 3.39 - 45
43.5%z 3.38 - 46
43.3%z 3.36 - 47
42.9%z 3.34 - 48
42.3%z 3.30 - 49
42.2%z 3.29 - 50
42.2%z 3.29