Newton Thomas Sigel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.7%z 4.65 - 2
81.9%z 4.17 - 3
80.7%z 4.07 - 4
80.5%z 4.06 - 5
80.2%z 4.03 - 6
65.3%z 3.86 - 7
59.1%z 3.79 - 8
58.3%z 3.78 - 9
52.8%z 3.72 - 10
51.1%z 3.70 - 11
49.6%z 3.68 - 12
46.4%z 3.56 - 13
46.1%z 3.54 - 14
45.8%z 3.52 - 15
45.7%z 3.52 - 16
45.2%z 3.48 - 17
44.5%z 3.44 - 18
44.3%z 3.43 - 19
44.2%z 3.42 - 20
42.7%z 3.33 - 21
42.1%z 3.28 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
41.9%z 3.27 - 24
41.6%z 3.25 - 25
41.4%z 3.24 - 26
41.3%z 3.23 - 27
41.2%z 3.23 - 28
41.2%z 3.22 - 29
40.9%z 3.21 - 30
40.9%z 3.21 - 31
40.6%z 3.19 - 32
40.6%z 3.18 - 33
40.5%z 3.18 - 34
40.4%z 3.17 - 35
40.3%z 3.17 - 36
40.1%z 3.16 - 37
40.1%z 3.15 - 38
39.9%z 3.14 - 39
39.8%z 3.14 - 40
39.7%z 3.13 - 41
39.4%z 3.11 - 42
39.4%z 3.11 - 43
39.2%z 3.10 - 44
39.1%z 3.09 - 45
39%z 3.08 - 46
38.9%z 3.08 - 47
38.6%z 3.06 - 48
38.5%z 3.05 - 49
38.5%z 3.05 - 50
38.5%z 3.05