Pam Dawber: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.8%z 4.57 - 2
84.4%z 4.38 - 3
82.6%z 4.23 - 4
80.3%z 4.04 - 5
75.6%z 3.97 - 6
74.8%z 3.96 - 7
73.6%z 3.95 - 8
72.3%z 3.93 - 9
71%z 3.92 - 10
65.8%z 3.86 - 11
64.5%z 3.85 - 12
64.2%z 3.84 - 13
60.9%z 3.81 - 14
59.6%z 3.79 - 15
58.1%z 3.78 - 16
55.2%z 3.74 - 17
54.9%z 3.74 - 18
54.3%z 3.74 - 19
52.3%z 3.71 - 20
52%z 3.71 - 21
51.1%z 3.70 - 22
48.5%z 3.67 - 23
47.7%z 3.65 - 24
47.4%z 3.63 - 25
47.2%z 3.62 - 26
47.2%z 3.61 - 27
47.1%z 3.61 - 28
47%z 3.60 - 29
47%z 3.60 - 30
46.9%z 3.59 - 31
46.9%z 3.59 - 32
46.8%z 3.59 - 33
46.8%z 3.59 - 34
46.7%z 3.58 - 35
46.6%z 3.58 - 36
46.6%z 3.57 - 37
46.5%z 3.57 - 38
46%z 3.54 - 39
45.6%z 3.51 - 40
45.4%z 3.50 - 41
45.3%z 3.49 - 42
45%z 3.48 - 43
44.9%z 3.47 - 44
44.9%z 3.46 - 45
44.7%z 3.46 - 46
44.7%z 3.45 - 47
44.7%z 3.45 - 48
44.6%z 3.45 - 49
44.6%z 3.44 - 50
44.1%z 3.42