Philip Egan: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82.4%z 4.21 - 2
80.7%z 4.08 - 3
80.7%z 4.08 - 4
67.5%z 3.88 - 5
58.3%z 3.78 - 6
52.2%z 3.71 - 7
49.7%z 3.68 - 8
48%z 3.66 - 9
47.6%z 3.64 - 10
46.7%z 3.58 - 11
46.5%z 3.57 - 12
46.1%z 3.55 - 13
44.5%z 3.44 - 14
41.5%z 3.24 - 15
40%z 3.15 - 16
40%z 3.15 - 17
39.4%z 3.11 - 18
39%z 3.09 - 19
38.8%z 3.07 - 20
38.8%z 3.07 - 21
38.7%z 3.06 - 22
37.9%z 3.01 - 23
37.6%z 3.00 - 24
37.6%z 2.99 - 25
37.5%z 2.99 - 26
37.3%z 2.97 - 27
36.7%z 2.94 - 28
36.6%z 2.93 - 29
36.5%z 2.92 - 30
36.3%z 2.91 - 31
36.3%z 2.91 - 32
36.1%z 2.90 - 33
36%z 2.89 - 34
36%z 2.89 - 35
35.6%z 2.87 - 36
35.4%z 2.85 - 37
35.3%z 2.84 - 38
35.3%z 2.84 - 39
35.1%z 2.83 - 40
35.1%z 2.83 - 41
35%z 2.82 - 42
35%z 2.82 - 43
34.9%z 2.82 - 44
34.7%z 2.80 - 45
34.6%z 2.80 - 46
34.2%z 2.77 - 47
34.1%z 2.77 - 48
34.1%z 2.76 - 49
33.9%z 2.75 - 50
33.8%z 2.75