Philip Michael Thomas: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.3%z 4.88 - 2
87.2%z 4.60 - 3
86.7%z 4.57 - 4
86.2%z 4.52 - 5
85.1%z 4.43 - 6
84.2%z 4.36 - 7
84%z 4.34 - 8
83.7%z 4.32 - 9
82.3%z 4.20 - 10
81.6%z 4.14 - 11
80.1%z 4.02 - 12
75.6%z 3.97 - 13
56.7%z 3.76 - 14
55.4%z 3.75 - 15
48%z 3.67 - 16
48%z 3.66 - 17
47.5%z 3.64 - 18
46.9%z 3.60 - 19
46.9%z 3.59 - 20
46.7%z 3.58 - 21
46.4%z 3.56 - 22
45.7%z 3.52 - 23
45.2%z 3.48 - 24
45.1%z 3.48 - 25
44.9%z 3.47 - 26
44.9%z 3.47 - 27
44.8%z 3.46 - 28
44.8%z 3.46 - 29
44.8%z 3.46 - 30
44.1%z 3.41 - 31
43.9%z 3.40 - 32
43.9%z 3.40 - 33
42.9%z 3.34 - 34
42.8%z 3.33 - 35
42.7%z 3.32 - 36
42.7%z 3.32 - 37
42.7%z 3.32 - 38
42.6%z 3.32 - 39
42.5%z 3.31 - 40
42.5%z 3.31 - 41
42.3%z 3.30 - 42
42.3%z 3.30 - 43
42.1%z 3.29 - 44
42.1%z 3.28 - 45
42%z 3.28 - 46
41.9%z 3.27 - 47
41.9%z 3.27 - 48
41.7%z 3.26 - 49
41.3%z 3.23 - 50
41.1%z 3.22