RiceGum: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.6%z 4.80 - 2
80.9%z 4.09 - 3
77.5%z 3.99 - 4
72%z 3.93 - 5
71.3%z 3.92 - 6
67.5%z 3.88 - 7
65%z 3.85 - 8
60.7%z 3.81 - 9
58.4%z 3.78 - 10
57.9%z 3.77 - 11
56.5%z 3.76 - 12
52.2%z 3.71 - 13
50.2%z 3.69 - 14
47.9%z 3.66 - 15
47.8%z 3.65 - 16
47.4%z 3.63 - 17
46.1%z 3.55 - 18
45.9%z 3.53 - 19
45.6%z 3.51 - 20
45.5%z 3.51 - 21
45.3%z 3.49 - 22
44.6%z 3.45 - 23
44.3%z 3.42 - 24
43.8%z 3.40 - 25
43.7%z 3.39 - 26
43.3%z 3.36 - 27
43%z 3.34 - 28
42.3%z 3.30 - 29
42.3%z 3.30 - 30
41.9%z 3.27 - 31
41.8%z 3.27 - 32
41.7%z 3.26 - 33
41.7%z 3.26 - 34
41.6%z 3.25 - 35
41.2%z 3.23 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
41%z 3.22 - 38
41%z 3.21 - 39
40.9%z 3.21 - 40
40.8%z 3.20 - 41
39.8%z 3.14 - 42
39.7%z 3.13 - 43
39.7%z 3.13 - 44
39.6%z 3.13 - 45
39.4%z 3.11 - 46
39.4%z 3.11 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
39.2%z 3.10 - 49
38.6%z 3.06 - 50
38.5%z 3.05