Richard Sammel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
91.6%z 5.14 - 2
84.1%z 4.35 - 3
70.4%z 3.91 - 4
51.9%z 3.71 - 5
51.9%z 3.71 - 6
48%z 3.67 - 7
47.3%z 3.62 - 8
45.9%z 3.53 - 9
45.8%z 3.52 - 10
44.1%z 3.42 - 11
43.8%z 3.40 - 12
43.4%z 3.37 - 13
43.4%z 3.37 - 14
43.3%z 3.36 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
42.3%z 3.30 - 17
42.3%z 3.29 - 18
41.5%z 3.25 - 19
41.3%z 3.23 - 20
41.2%z 3.22 - 21
41.1%z 3.22 - 22
41.1%z 3.22 - 23
40.8%z 3.20 - 24
40.7%z 3.20 - 25
40.7%z 3.20 - 26
40.1%z 3.16 - 27
40%z 3.15 - 28
39.8%z 3.14 - 29
39.8%z 3.13 - 30
39.4%z 3.11 - 31
38.9%z 3.08 - 32
38.9%z 3.07 - 33
37.8%z 3.00 - 34
37.7%z 3.00 - 35
37.6%z 2.99 - 36
37.4%z 2.98 - 37
37.2%z 2.97 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.7%z 2.93 - 40
36.7%z 2.93 - 41
36.7%z 2.93 - 42
36.6%z 2.93 - 43
36.6%z 2.93 - 44
36.3%z 2.91 - 45
36.3%z 2.91 - 46
36.2%z 2.90 - 47
36.2%z 2.90 - 48
36.1%z 2.89 - 49
36%z 2.89 - 50
35.8%z 2.88