Samantha Whitcomb: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
72.2%z 3.93 - 2
69.1%z 3.90 - 3
68.2%z 3.89 - 4
59.2%z 3.79 - 5
52.3%z 3.71 - 6
50.3%z 3.69 - 7
49.9%z 3.69 - 8
47.6%z 3.64 - 9
45.6%z 3.51 - 10
45.4%z 3.50 - 11
45%z 3.47 - 12
44.8%z 3.46 - 13
44.8%z 3.46 - 14
44.1%z 3.41 - 15
43.4%z 3.37 - 16
43.3%z 3.36 - 17
43.1%z 3.35 - 18
42.9%z 3.34 - 19
42.9%z 3.34 - 20
42.9%z 3.34 - 21
42.3%z 3.30 - 22
42.1%z 3.28 - 23
41.9%z 3.27 - 24
41.9%z 3.27 - 25
41.4%z 3.24 - 26
41.2%z 3.23 - 27
41%z 3.22 - 28
40.9%z 3.20 - 29
40.8%z 3.20 - 30
40.6%z 3.19 - 31
40.6%z 3.18 - 32
40.5%z 3.18 - 33
40.5%z 3.18 - 34
40.2%z 3.16 - 35
40%z 3.15 - 36
39.5%z 3.11 - 37
39.3%z 3.10 - 38
39.3%z 3.10 - 39
39.2%z 3.10 - 40
39%z 3.08 - 41
38.9%z 3.08 - 42
38.5%z 3.05 - 43
38.5%z 3.05 - 44
38.5%z 3.05 - 45
38.1%z 3.03 - 46
38.1%z 3.02 - 47
38.1%z 3.02 - 48
38%z 3.02 - 49
38%z 3.02 - 50
37.9%z 3.01