Slim Jim Phantom: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86.3%z 4.53 - 2
80.9%z 4.09 - 3
79.4%z 4.01 - 4
76.5%z 3.98 - 5
66.2%z 3.87 - 6
60.4%z 3.80 - 7
59.9%z 3.80 - 8
58.6%z 3.78 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
46.8%z 3.59 - 11
46.3%z 3.56 - 12
46.3%z 3.56 - 13
46.2%z 3.55 - 14
45.7%z 3.52 - 15
45.6%z 3.51 - 16
45.5%z 3.51 - 17
45.2%z 3.49 - 18
45.1%z 3.48 - 19
44.8%z 3.46 - 20
44.5%z 3.44 - 21
44.3%z 3.43 - 22
44%z 3.41 - 23
43.8%z 3.39 - 24
43.8%z 3.39 - 25
43.4%z 3.37 - 26
43.1%z 3.35 - 27
42.9%z 3.34 - 28
42.6%z 3.31 - 29
42.4%z 3.30 - 30
41.8%z 3.27 - 31
41.8%z 3.26 - 32
41.6%z 3.25 - 33
41.3%z 3.23 - 34
40.7%z 3.20 - 35
40.5%z 3.18 - 36
40.5%z 3.18 - 37
40.4%z 3.17 - 38
40.4%z 3.17 - 39
40.2%z 3.16 - 40
40%z 3.15 - 41
40%z 3.15 - 42
39.9%z 3.14 - 43
39.5%z 3.11 - 44
39.4%z 3.11 - 45
39.3%z 3.10 - 46
38.9%z 3.08 - 47
38.8%z 3.07 - 48
38.6%z 3.06 - 49
38.5%z 3.05 - 50
38.1%z 3.03