Slim Thug: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
61.5%z 3.81 - 2
56.4%z 3.76 - 3
48%z 3.66 - 4
47.2%z 3.61 - 5
47.2%z 3.61 - 6
46.8%z 3.59 - 7
45.5%z 3.51 - 8
44.9%z 3.47 - 9
43.8%z 3.40 - 10
43.8%z 3.40 - 11
43.7%z 3.39 - 12
43.5%z 3.37 - 13
43.2%z 3.36 - 14
42.6%z 3.32 - 15
42.1%z 3.29 - 16
41.5%z 3.25 - 17
41.4%z 3.24 - 18
41.2%z 3.22 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.6%z 3.18 - 21
40.5%z 3.18 - 22
39.5%z 3.12 - 23
38.6%z 3.06 - 24
38.6%z 3.06 - 25
38.4%z 3.04 - 26
38%z 3.02 - 27
37.9%z 3.01 - 28
37.7%z 3.00 - 29
37.2%z 2.97 - 30
36.9%z 2.94 - 31
36.7%z 2.93 - 32
36.6%z 2.93 - 33
36.3%z 2.91 - 34
36.2%z 2.90 - 35
36.2%z 2.90 - 36
36.2%z 2.90 - 37
36.1%z 2.89 - 38
36%z 2.89 - 39
36%z 2.89 - 40
36%z 2.89 - 41
35.8%z 2.88 - 42
35.7%z 2.87 - 43
35.5%z 2.86 - 44
35.3%z 2.84 - 45
35%z 2.83 - 46
34.9%z 2.82 - 47
34.9%z 2.81 - 48
34.7%z 2.81 - 49
34.6%z 2.80 - 50
34.6%z 2.80