Son Dam-bi: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
95.1%z 5.80 - 2
92.4%z 5.29 - 3
91.3%z 5.07 - 4
90.7%z 4.97 - 5
90.6%z 4.94 - 6
90.3%z 4.89 - 7
90.1%z 4.85 - 8
89.5%z 4.79 - 9
88.2%z 4.68 - 10
87.6%z 4.64 - 11
86.9%z 4.58 - 12
86.9%z 4.58 - 13
86.9%z 4.58 - 14
86.3%z 4.53 - 15
85.9%z 4.50 - 16
85%z 4.42 - 17
84.5%z 4.39 - 18
83.9%z 4.33 - 19
83.4%z 4.30 - 20
82.6%z 4.23 - 21
81.8%z 4.17 - 22
81.4%z 4.13 - 23
81.2%z 4.11 - 24
81%z 4.10 - 25
80.9%z 4.09 - 26
80.7%z 4.08 - 27
80.4%z 4.05 - 28
80.4%z 4.05 - 29
80.2%z 4.03 - 30
80.2%z 4.03 - 31
80.1%z 4.03 - 32
80.1%z 4.02 - 33
80.1%z 4.02 - 34
79.1%z 4.01 - 35
78.7%z 4.00 - 36
78.2%z 4.00 - 37
75.5%z 3.97 - 38
74.9%z 3.96 - 39
68.3%z 3.89 - 40
64.1%z 3.84 - 41
63.4%z 3.84 - 42
61.7%z 3.82 - 43
60.9%z 3.81 - 44
60.7%z 3.81 - 45
59.6%z 3.79 - 46
59.5%z 3.79 - 47
59%z 3.79 - 48
58.2%z 3.78 - 49
57.8%z 3.77 - 50
57.8%z 3.77