Tad Williams: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.5%z 4.63 - 2
82.6%z 4.23 - 3
82%z 4.18 - 4
81.2%z 4.11 - 5
70.2%z 3.91 - 6
53.2%z 3.72 - 7
53.1%z 3.72 - 8
50.3%z 3.69 - 9
47.8%z 3.65 - 10
47.2%z 3.62 - 11
46.9%z 3.59 - 12
46.2%z 3.55 - 13
45.5%z 3.50 - 14
45.1%z 3.48 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
43.8%z 3.39 - 17
43.2%z 3.36 - 18
42.9%z 3.34 - 19
42.1%z 3.28 - 20
42%z 3.28 - 21
42%z 3.28 - 22
41.9%z 3.27 - 23
41.1%z 3.22 - 24
40.9%z 3.21 - 25
40.7%z 3.19 - 26
40.5%z 3.18 - 27
40.3%z 3.17 - 28
40.3%z 3.17 - 29
40.3%z 3.17 - 30
40.2%z 3.16 - 31
40.2%z 3.16 - 32
39.9%z 3.14 - 33
39.9%z 3.14 - 34
39.7%z 3.13 - 35
39.6%z 3.12 - 36
39.1%z 3.09 - 37
39%z 3.08 - 38
38.9%z 3.08 - 39
38.9%z 3.07 - 40
38.7%z 3.07 - 41
38.4%z 3.05 - 42
38.1%z 3.03 - 43
38%z 3.02 - 44
37.7%z 3.00 - 45
37.7%z 3.00 - 46
37.6%z 2.99 - 47
37.4%z 2.98 - 48
37.4%z 2.98 - 49
37.3%z 2.97 - 50
37.2%z 2.97