Tadhg Furlong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
64%z 3.84 - 2
47.4%z 3.63 - 3
46.6%z 3.58 - 4
46.6%z 3.58 - 5
46.2%z 3.55 - 6
45.8%z 3.52 - 7
45.2%z 3.49 - 8
44.1%z 3.41 - 9
43.4%z 3.37 - 10
43.4%z 3.37 - 11
43.3%z 3.36 - 12
43%z 3.34 - 13
42%z 3.28 - 14
41.8%z 3.27 - 15
41.5%z 3.24 - 16
41.4%z 3.24 - 17
41.3%z 3.23 - 18
40.9%z 3.21 - 19
40.3%z 3.17 - 20
40.3%z 3.17 - 21
40.3%z 3.17 - 22
39.7%z 3.13 - 23
39.7%z 3.13 - 24
39.6%z 3.12 - 25
39.5%z 3.11 - 26
39.3%z 3.10 - 27
39.2%z 3.10 - 28
38.1%z 3.02 - 29
37.8%z 3.00 - 30
37.5%z 2.98 - 31
37.3%z 2.97 - 32
36.5%z 2.92 - 33
36.4%z 2.91 - 34
36.3%z 2.91 - 35
36.2%z 2.90 - 36
36.2%z 2.90 - 37
36.1%z 2.89 - 38
36%z 2.89 - 39
35.7%z 2.87 - 40
35.4%z 2.85 - 41
35.3%z 2.84 - 42
35.3%z 2.84 - 43
35%z 2.83 - 44
35%z 2.83 - 45
35%z 2.83 - 46
35%z 2.82 - 47
34.7%z 2.81 - 48
34.6%z 2.80 - 49
34.6%z 2.80 - 50
34.5%z 2.79