Taylor Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
89.4%z 4.78 - 2
83.4%z 4.29 - 3
83.3%z 4.29 - 4
82.6%z 4.23 - 5
80.7%z 4.08 - 6
75.6%z 3.97 - 7
74%z 3.95 - 8
70.7%z 3.91 - 9
69.8%z 3.91 - 10
69.4%z 3.90 - 11
61.9%z 3.82 - 12
61.1%z 3.81 - 13
53.6%z 3.73 - 14
50.9%z 3.70 - 15
49.8%z 3.69 - 16
47.8%z 3.65 - 17
47.7%z 3.64 - 18
46.7%z 3.58 - 19
46.7%z 3.58 - 20
46.6%z 3.58 - 21
45.8%z 3.52 - 22
45.5%z 3.51 - 23
45.3%z 3.49 - 24
45.2%z 3.49 - 25
45.1%z 3.48 - 26
45%z 3.48 - 27
44.9%z 3.46 - 28
44.7%z 3.45 - 29
44.4%z 3.44 - 30
44%z 3.41 - 31
44%z 3.40 - 32
43.9%z 3.40 - 33
43.4%z 3.37 - 34
43.1%z 3.35 - 35
42.8%z 3.33 - 36
42.6%z 3.32 - 37
42.2%z 3.29 - 38
42.2%z 3.29 - 39
41.7%z 3.26 - 40
41.6%z 3.25 - 41
41.6%z 3.25 - 42
41.1%z 3.22 - 43
41%z 3.21 - 44
41%z 3.21 - 45
40.9%z 3.21 - 46
40.9%z 3.20 - 47
40.8%z 3.20 - 48
40.8%z 3.20 - 49
40.4%z 3.17