Taylor Muhl: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.8%z 4.49 - 2
82.4%z 4.21 - 3
80.6%z 4.06 - 4
80.1%z 4.03 - 5
78.4%z 4.00 - 6
56.3%z 3.76 - 7
54.3%z 3.74 - 8
52%z 3.71 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
47.6%z 3.64 - 11
46.8%z 3.59 - 12
46%z 3.54 - 13
45.7%z 3.52 - 14
45.5%z 3.51 - 15
44.7%z 3.45 - 16
44.6%z 3.45 - 17
44.4%z 3.43 - 18
44.4%z 3.43 - 19
43.7%z 3.39 - 20
43.6%z 3.38 - 21
43.2%z 3.35 - 22
42.7%z 3.32 - 23
42.6%z 3.32 - 24
42.3%z 3.30 - 25
42.3%z 3.30 - 26
42.1%z 3.28 - 27
42.1%z 3.28 - 28
41.7%z 3.26 - 29
41.7%z 3.26 - 30
41.6%z 3.25 - 31
41.2%z 3.22 - 32
40.7%z 3.19 - 33
40.6%z 3.18 - 34
40.4%z 3.17 - 35
40.2%z 3.16 - 36
40.1%z 3.15 - 37
40.1%z 3.15 - 38
39.9%z 3.14 - 39
39.9%z 3.14 - 40
39.8%z 3.14 - 41
39.7%z 3.13 - 42
39.7%z 3.13 - 43
39.6%z 3.12 - 44
39.6%z 3.12 - 45
39.4%z 3.11 - 46
39.4%z 3.11 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
39.2%z 3.10 - 49
39%z 3.09 - 50
39%z 3.08