Thomas Carell: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
92.5%z 5.30 - 2
89.3%z 4.78 - 3
84.1%z 4.36 - 4
83.9%z 4.33 - 5
82.2%z 4.20 - 6
80.1%z 4.02 - 7
75.4%z 3.97 - 8
65.8%z 3.86 - 9
65.4%z 3.86 - 10
60.6%z 3.80 - 11
47.9%z 3.66 - 12
47.8%z 3.65 - 13
47.1%z 3.61 - 14
47.1%z 3.61 - 15
46.4%z 3.56 - 16
46%z 3.53 - 17
45.7%z 3.52 - 18
45.7%z 3.52 - 19
45.1%z 3.48 - 20
44.1%z 3.42 - 21
43.1%z 3.35 - 22
43.1%z 3.35 - 23
42.5%z 3.31 - 24
42.4%z 3.31 - 25
42.4%z 3.30 - 26
42.3%z 3.30 - 27
42.2%z 3.29 - 28
42.2%z 3.29 - 29
42.1%z 3.28 - 30
42%z 3.28 - 31
41.9%z 3.27 - 32
41.5%z 3.24 - 33
41.5%z 3.24 - 34
41.3%z 3.23 - 35
40.8%z 3.20 - 36
40.7%z 3.20 - 37
40.7%z 3.19 - 38
40.3%z 3.16 - 39
40.2%z 3.16 - 40
40.2%z 3.16 - 41
40%z 3.15 - 42
39.9%z 3.14 - 43
39.7%z 3.13 - 44
39.2%z 3.09 - 45
39%z 3.09 - 46
39%z 3.08 - 47
38.9%z 3.07 - 48
38.9%z 3.07 - 49
38.8%z 3.07 - 50
38.8%z 3.07