Thomas Hayo: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.6%z 4.31 - 2
81%z 4.10 - 3
45.5%z 3.50 - 4
45.2%z 3.48 - 5
44.1%z 3.41 - 6
42.7%z 3.33 - 7
42.6%z 3.32 - 8
41.8%z 3.27 - 9
40.9%z 3.21 - 10
40.9%z 3.21 - 11
40.5%z 3.18 - 12
40.3%z 3.17 - 13
39.9%z 3.14 - 14
39.6%z 3.12 - 15
39.4%z 3.11 - 16
39.3%z 3.10 - 17
39.2%z 3.10 - 18
38.5%z 3.05 - 19
38.5%z 3.05 - 20
38.5%z 3.05 - 21
38.5%z 3.05 - 22
38.3%z 3.04 - 23
38.3%z 3.04 - 24
38.2%z 3.03 - 25
38%z 3.02 - 26
38%z 3.02 - 27
38%z 3.02 - 28
37.7%z 3.00 - 29
37.7%z 3.00 - 30
37.5%z 2.99 - 31
37.4%z 2.98 - 32
37.2%z 2.97 - 33
37.2%z 2.97 - 34
37.1%z 2.96 - 35
37.1%z 2.96 - 36
37%z 2.96 - 37
37%z 2.96 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.8%z 2.94 - 40
36.7%z 2.93 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
36.2%z 2.90 - 43
36.2%z 2.90 - 44
36.2%z 2.90 - 45
35.7%z 2.87 - 46
35.6%z 2.86 - 47
35.6%z 2.86 - 48
35.5%z 2.86 - 49
35.5%z 2.86 - 50
35.3%z 2.84