Thomas Homan: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.8%z 4.08 - 2
77.2%z 3.99 - 3
63.9%z 3.84 - 4
53.6%z 3.73 - 5
53.5%z 3.73 - 6
46.1%z 3.55 - 7
45.1%z 3.48 - 8
45%z 3.47 - 9
44.9%z 3.46 - 10
44.8%z 3.46 - 11
44.8%z 3.46 - 12
44.3%z 3.42 - 13
43.6%z 3.38 - 14
43.5%z 3.38 - 15
42%z 3.28 - 16
42%z 3.27 - 17
41.2%z 3.23 - 18
40.9%z 3.21 - 19
40.7%z 3.19 - 20
40.3%z 3.17 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
40.2%z 3.16 - 23
40.1%z 3.16 - 24
40%z 3.15 - 25
39.4%z 3.11 - 26
39.2%z 3.10 - 27
39%z 3.08 - 28
38.8%z 3.07 - 29
38.7%z 3.06 - 30
38.4%z 3.05 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
38%z 3.02 - 33
37.7%z 3.00 - 34
37.6%z 2.99 - 35
37.3%z 2.97 - 36
37%z 2.95 - 37
36.9%z 2.95 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.4%z 2.91 - 40
36.3%z 2.91 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
36.1%z 2.90 - 43
36.1%z 2.90 - 44
36%z 2.89 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
35.9%z 2.88 - 47
35.9%z 2.88 - 48
35.9%z 2.88 - 49
35.9%z 2.88