Thomas Lam: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.1%z 4.35 - 2
83.4%z 4.30 - 3
81%z 4.10 - 4
77.8%z 3.99 - 5
70.7%z 3.91 - 6
50.8%z 3.70 - 7
50.8%z 3.70 - 8
47.9%z 3.66 - 9
47.7%z 3.65 - 10
47.3%z 3.62 - 11
47.3%z 3.62 - 12
46.9%z 3.59 - 13
46.8%z 3.59 - 14
46.3%z 3.56 - 15
45.7%z 3.52 - 16
45.6%z 3.51 - 17
45.5%z 3.51 - 18
45.4%z 3.50 - 19
45.3%z 3.49 - 20
44.8%z 3.46 - 21
44.8%z 3.46 - 22
44.5%z 3.44 - 23
44.2%z 3.42 - 24
44.1%z 3.41 - 25
44.1%z 3.41 - 26
43.6%z 3.38 - 27
43.4%z 3.37 - 28
43.4%z 3.37 - 29
43.3%z 3.36 - 30
42.9%z 3.34 - 31
42.7%z 3.32 - 32
42.7%z 3.32 - 33
42.5%z 3.31 - 34
42.5%z 3.31 - 35
42.3%z 3.30 - 36
42.3%z 3.29 - 37
42.1%z 3.29 - 38
41.3%z 3.23 - 39
41.1%z 3.22 - 40
40.9%z 3.21 - 4140.8%z 3.20
- 42
40.6%z 3.19 - 43
40.5%z 3.18 - 44
40.3%z 3.16 - 45
40.2%z 3.16 - 46
40.1%z 3.16 - 47
39.9%z 3.14 - 48
39.7%z 3.13 - 49
39.5%z 3.12 - 50
39.5%z 3.11