Thomas Lurz: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84.4%z 4.38 - 2
82%z 4.18 - 3
74.7%z 3.96 - 4
73.7%z 3.95 - 5
59.2%z 3.79 - 6
57.3%z 3.77 - 7
52.5%z 3.72 - 8
52.2%z 3.71 - 9
46.3%z 3.56 - 10
46.1%z 3.54 - 11
45%z 3.47 - 12
44.8%z 3.46 - 13
44.5%z 3.44 - 14
44.4%z 3.43 - 15
43.8%z 3.40 - 16
43.7%z 3.39 - 17
43.5%z 3.37 - 18
43.2%z 3.35 - 19
43%z 3.34 - 20
42.2%z 3.29 - 21
42%z 3.28 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
42%z 3.27 - 24
41.9%z 3.27 - 25
41%z 3.21 - 26
40.8%z 3.20 - 27
40.2%z 3.16 - 28
40.1%z 3.15 - 29
40%z 3.15 - 30
39.8%z 3.13 - 31
39.6%z 3.12 - 32
39.2%z 3.09 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
38.6%z 3.06 - 35
38.6%z 3.06 - 36
38.6%z 3.06 - 37
38.2%z 3.03 - 38
38.1%z 3.03 - 39
38.1%z 3.02 - 40
37.8%z 3.01 - 41
37.7%z 3.00 - 42
37.6%z 2.99 - 43
37%z 2.95 - 44
36.7%z 2.94 - 45
36.6%z 2.93 - 46
36.5%z 2.92 - 47
36.4%z 2.91 - 48
36.3%z 2.91 - 49
36.2%z 2.90 - 50
36.2%z 2.90