Thomas Mandl: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.5%z 4.30 - 2
80.6%z 4.07 - 3
71.3%z 3.92 - 4
64.7%z 3.85 - 5
44.5%z 3.44 - 6
44.2%z 3.42 - 7
43.9%z 3.40 - 8
43.4%z 3.37 - 9
43.2%z 3.36 - 10
43.2%z 3.35 - 11
43.1%z 3.35 - 12
42.5%z 3.31 - 13
41.7%z 3.26 - 14
41.7%z 3.26 - 15
40.7%z 3.19 - 16
40.4%z 3.17 - 17
40.3%z 3.17 - 18
40.1%z 3.15 - 19
39.4%z 3.11 - 20
39.3%z 3.10 - 21
39.2%z 3.10 - 22
39.1%z 3.09 - 23
39.1%z 3.09 - 24
39.1%z 3.09 - 25
39%z 3.09 - 26
38.6%z 3.05 - 27
38.4%z 3.04 - 28
38%z 3.02 - 29
37.9%z 3.01 - 30
37.9%z 3.01 - 31
37.7%z 3.00 - 32
37.4%z 2.98 - 33
37.3%z 2.97 - 34
37%z 2.95 - 35
36.9%z 2.95 - 36
36.8%z 2.94 - 37
36.7%z 2.93 - 38
36.6%z 2.93 - 39
35.3%z 2.84 - 40
35.3%z 2.84 - 41
35.2%z 2.84 - 42
35.2%z 2.83 - 43
35.1%z 2.83 - 44
35.1%z 2.83 - 45
35%z 2.82 - 46
35%z 2.82 - 47
34.7%z 2.80 - 48
34.2%z 2.77 - 49
34.2%z 2.77 - 50
34.2%z 2.77