Thomas Maos: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
94.6%z 5.70 - 2
82.9%z 4.25 - 3
71%z 3.92 - 4
69.8%z 3.90 - 5
68.8%z 3.89 - 6
57.1%z 3.77 - 7
51.8%z 3.71 - 8
48.6%z 3.67 - 9
47.2%z 3.62 - 10
47.1%z 3.61 - 11
47%z 3.60 - 12
46.8%z 3.59 - 13
45.3%z 3.49 - 14
45.2%z 3.49 - 15
45%z 3.47 - 16
44.7%z 3.45 - 17
43.3%z 3.36 - 18
43.3%z 3.36 - 19
43.2%z 3.36 - 20
43.2%z 3.35 - 21
42.4%z 3.30 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
42%z 3.28 - 24
41.5%z 3.24 - 25
41.4%z 3.24 - 26
41.4%z 3.24 - 27
41.3%z 3.24 - 28
41.1%z 3.22 - 29
41%z 3.21 - 30
40.9%z 3.20 - 31
40.7%z 3.19 - 32
40.6%z 3.19 - 33
40.4%z 3.17 - 34
40.3%z 3.17 - 35
40.3%z 3.16 - 36
40.2%z 3.16 - 37
40.2%z 3.16 - 38
40.2%z 3.16 - 39
40.1%z 3.15 - 40
40%z 3.15 - 41
39.9%z 3.14 - 42
39.8%z 3.14 - 43
39.7%z 3.13 - 44
39.6%z 3.12 - 45
39.6%z 3.12 - 46
39.2%z 3.10 - 47
39.2%z 3.10 - 48
39.1%z 3.09 - 49
39%z 3.08 - 50
38.9%z 3.08