Thomas Siebel: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
86%z 4.51 - 2
84.3%z 4.37 - 3
81.6%z 4.15 - 4
81.4%z 4.13 - 5
65.5%z 3.86 - 6
64.4%z 3.85 - 7
62.7%z 3.83 - 8
48.9%z 3.68 - 9
48%z 3.67 - 10
47.8%z 3.65 - 11
47.8%z 3.65 - 12
47.6%z 3.64 - 13
46.6%z 3.57 - 14
45.2%z 3.49 - 15
44.9%z 3.47 - 16
44.8%z 3.46 - 17
44.5%z 3.44 - 18
44.3%z 3.43 - 19
44.2%z 3.42 - 20
44%z 3.41 - 21
43.1%z 3.35 - 22
43.1%z 3.35 - 23
43%z 3.34 - 24
42.7%z 3.33 - 25
42.7%z 3.33 - 26
42.7%z 3.32 - 27
42.5%z 3.31 - 28
42.4%z 3.30 - 29
42.2%z 3.29 - 30
42.1%z 3.28 - 31
42.1%z 3.28 - 32
41.7%z 3.26 - 33
41.6%z 3.25 - 34
41.2%z 3.23 - 35
40.8%z 3.20 - 36
40.6%z 3.18 - 37
40.3%z 3.17 - 38
40%z 3.15 - 39
39.6%z 3.12 - 40
39.5%z 3.12 - 41
39.3%z 3.11 - 42
39.2%z 3.10 - 43
38.9%z 3.08 - 44
38.9%z 3.07 - 45
38.8%z 3.07 - 46
38.5%z 3.05 - 47
38.4%z 3.05 - 48
38.4%z 3.04 - 49
38.3%z 3.04 - 50
38%z 3.02