Thomas Woodcock: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.8%z 4.08 - 2
64.3%z 3.85 - 3
62.7%z 3.83 - 4
58.3%z 3.78 - 5
50.5%z 3.69 - 6
49.3%z 3.68 - 7
48.8%z 3.68 - 8
47.8%z 3.65 - 9
47.3%z 3.62 - 10
46.3%z 3.56 - 11
45.2%z 3.49 - 12
45.2%z 3.49 - 13
45%z 3.47 - 14
44.1%z 3.41 - 15
44%z 3.41 - 16
44%z 3.41 - 17
43.9%z 3.40 - 18
42.8%z 3.33 - 19
42.7%z 3.32 - 20
42.7%z 3.32 - 21
42.2%z 3.29 - 22
42.2%z 3.29 - 23
41.8%z 3.27 - 24
41.8%z 3.27 - 25
41.8%z 3.27 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.5%z 3.25 - 28
41.4%z 3.24 - 29
41.1%z 3.22 - 30
41%z 3.21 - 31
40.6%z 3.18 - 32
40.2%z 3.16 - 33
39.9%z 3.14 - 34
39.6%z 3.12 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.4%z 3.11 - 37
38.8%z 3.07 - 38
38.7%z 3.06 - 39
38.4%z 3.04 - 40
38.4%z 3.04 - 41
38.3%z 3.03 - 42
38.2%z 3.03 - 43
38.2%z 3.03 - 44
38%z 3.02 - 45
37.9%z 3.01 - 46
37.7%z 3.00 - 47
37.5%z 2.99 - 48
37.5%z 2.98 - 49
37.2%z 2.96 - 50
36.5%z 2.92