Thomas Woods: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
87.1%z 4.60 - 2
80.8%z 4.08 - 3
80.6%z 4.07 - 4
80.3%z 4.04 - 5
73%z 3.94 - 6
67.9%z 3.88 - 7
66%z 3.86 - 8
64.6%z 3.85 - 9
60.8%z 3.81 - 10
57.8%z 3.77 - 11
57.4%z 3.77 - 12
52.6%z 3.72 - 13
52.4%z 3.71 - 14
50.4%z 3.69 - 15
49.9%z 3.69 - 16
47.7%z 3.65 - 17
46.7%z 3.58 - 18
46.3%z 3.56 - 19
45.9%z 3.53 - 20
45.3%z 3.49 - 21
44.9%z 3.47 - 22
44.8%z 3.46 - 23
44.6%z 3.44 - 24
44.5%z 3.44 - 25
44.3%z 3.43 - 26
44%z 3.41 - 27
43.3%z 3.36 - 28
43.2%z 3.35 - 29
43%z 3.34 - 30
43%z 3.34 - 31
42.9%z 3.34 - 32
42.7%z 3.33 - 33
42.1%z 3.29 - 34
41.9%z 3.27 - 35
41.9%z 3.27 - 36
41.8%z 3.26 - 37
41.1%z 3.22 - 38
41.1%z 3.22 - 39
41.1%z 3.22 - 40
40.9%z 3.20 - 41
40.8%z 3.20 - 42
40.5%z 3.18 - 43
40.2%z 3.16 - 44
39.7%z 3.13 - 45
39.5%z 3.12 - 46
39.5%z 3.12 - 47
39.4%z 3.11 - 48
39.4%z 3.11 - 49
39.4%z 3.11 - 50
39.3%z 3.10