Thomas Young Davis: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
95.1%z 5.78 - 2
69%z 3.90 - 3
66.7%z 3.87 - 4
66.3%z 3.87 - 5
64%z 3.84 - 6
61%z 3.81 - 7
49.6%z 3.68 - 8
47.4%z 3.63 - 9
46.6%z 3.58 - 10
46.6%z 3.57 - 11
46.3%z 3.55 - 12
44.9%z 3.47 - 13
44.7%z 3.45 - 14
44.7%z 3.45 - 15
44.1%z 3.42 - 16
44%z 3.41 - 17
43.9%z 3.40 - 18
43.4%z 3.37 - 19
42.7%z 3.32 - 20
42.1%z 3.28 - 21
42%z 3.28 - 22
42%z 3.27 - 23
41.7%z 3.26 - 24
41.6%z 3.25 - 25
40.3%z 3.17 - 26
40.1%z 3.15 - 27
39.8%z 3.14 - 28
39.5%z 3.12 - 29
39.4%z 3.11 - 30
39.3%z 3.10 - 31
39.2%z 3.10 - 32
38.9%z 3.08 - 33
38.7%z 3.07 - 34
38.6%z 3.05 - 35
38.4%z 3.04 - 36
38.1%z 3.03 - 37
37.9%z 3.01 - 38
37.9%z 3.01 - 39
37.8%z 3.01 - 40
37.8%z 3.01 - 41
37.8%z 3.00 - 42
37.6%z 2.99 - 43
37.6%z 2.99 - 44
37.4%z 2.98 - 45
37.1%z 2.96 - 46
36.7%z 2.94 - 47
36.7%z 2.93 - 48
36.6%z 2.93 - 49
36.6%z 2.93 - 50
36.6%z 2.93