Tim Flowers: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
78%z 3.99 - 2
64.8%z 3.85 - 3
58.2%z 3.78 - 4
47.2%z 3.61 - 5
46.9%z 3.60 - 6
46.6%z 3.58 - 7
44.9%z 3.47 - 8
44.8%z 3.46 - 9
44.8%z 3.46 - 10
44.2%z 3.42 - 11
43.5%z 3.37 - 1243.3%z 3.36
- 13
42.8%z 3.33 - 14
41.4%z 3.24 - 15
41.3%z 3.24 - 16
41%z 3.21 - 17
40.8%z 3.20 - 18
40.7%z 3.19 - 19
40.6%z 3.19 - 20
40.5%z 3.18 - 21
40.3%z 3.17 - 22
40.3%z 3.17 - 23
40.1%z 3.16 - 24
40%z 3.15 - 25
39.9%z 3.14 - 26
39.9%z 3.14 - 27
39.1%z 3.09 - 28
39%z 3.08 - 29
38.5%z 3.05 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.3%z 3.04 - 32
38.3%z 3.04 - 33
38.1%z 3.03 - 34
37.7%z 3.00 - 35
37.7%z 3.00 - 36
37.6%z 2.99 - 37
37.6%z 2.99 - 38
37.5%z 2.98 - 39
37.3%z 2.97 - 40
37.1%z 2.96 - 41
36.9%z 2.95 - 42
36.8%z 2.94 - 43
36.8%z 2.94 - 44
36.7%z 2.93 - 45
36.5%z 2.92 - 46
36.4%z 2.92 - 47
35.9%z 2.88 - 48
35.7%z 2.87 - 49
35.6%z 2.86 - 50
35.6%z 2.86