Tim Sparwasser: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
80.3%z 4.04 - 2
73.4%z 3.94 - 3
71.6%z 3.92 - 4
49.7%z 3.68 - 5
47.9%z 3.66 - 6
46.4%z 3.56 - 7
45.2%z 3.48 - 8
44%z 3.41 - 9
43.6%z 3.38 - 10
43.3%z 3.36 - 11
43%z 3.34 - 12
42.8%z 3.33 - 13
42.1%z 3.29 - 14
41.1%z 3.22 - 15
40.9%z 3.21 - 16
40.9%z 3.21 - 17
40.4%z 3.17 - 18
40.3%z 3.17 - 19
40.3%z 3.17 - 20
40.2%z 3.16 - 21
40.2%z 3.16 - 22
39.8%z 3.14 - 23
39.7%z 3.13 - 24
39.4%z 3.11 - 25
38.9%z 3.08 - 26
38.9%z 3.08 - 27
38.7%z 3.07 - 28
38.7%z 3.06 - 29
38.6%z 3.06 - 30
38.5%z 3.05 - 31
38.2%z 3.03 - 32
37.9%z 3.01 - 33
37.4%z 2.98 - 34
37.4%z 2.98 - 35
37.3%z 2.98 - 36
37%z 2.95 - 37
36.8%z 2.94 - 38
36.4%z 2.92 - 39
36.3%z 2.91 - 40
36.2%z 2.90 - 41
36.2%z 2.90 - 42
36.2%z 2.90 - 43
36.1%z 2.90 - 44
36.1%z 2.89 - 45
36%z 2.89 - 46
35.9%z 2.89 - 47
35.7%z 2.87 - 48
35.3%z 2.84 - 49
35.2%z 2.84 - 50
35.1%z 2.83