Timothy Eyom: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
93.8%z 5.54 - 2
89.6%z 4.80 - 3
86.4%z 4.54 - 4
82.6%z 4.23 - 5
82%z 4.18 - 6
71.6%z 3.93 - 7
63.9%z 3.84 - 8
51.3%z 3.70 - 9
50.6%z 3.69 - 10
45.9%z 3.53 - 1145.4%z 3.50
- 12
44.9%z 3.46 - 13
44.7%z 3.46 - 14
44.7%z 3.45 - 15
44%z 3.41 - 16
44%z 3.41 - 17
43.8%z 3.39 - 18
43.7%z 3.39 - 19
43.4%z 3.37 - 20
42.7%z 3.33 - 21
42.4%z 3.30 - 22
42.4%z 3.30 - 23
42.2%z 3.29 - 24
42%z 3.28 - 25
41.9%z 3.27 - 26
41.8%z 3.26 - 27
41.6%z 3.25 - 28
41.3%z 3.23 - 29
41.2%z 3.22 - 30
41.1%z 3.22 - 31
40.9%z 3.21 - 32
40.9%z 3.20 - 33
40.6%z 3.19 - 3440.3%z 3.16
- 35
40%z 3.15 - 36
39.8%z 3.14 - 37
39.7%z 3.13 - 38
39.5%z 3.11 - 39
39.4%z 3.11 - 40
38.6%z 3.06 - 41
38.5%z 3.05 - 4238.2%z 3.03
- 43
38.1%z 3.03 - 44
38.1%z 3.03 - 45
37.9%z 3.01 - 46
37.8%z 3.00 - 4737.7%z 3.00
- 48
37.4%z 2.98 - 49
37.4%z 2.98 - 50
37.2%z 2.97