Timothy Garton Ash: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.7%z 4.48 - 2
84.2%z 4.36 - 3
84.2%z 4.36 - 4
81.9%z 4.17 - 5
81.8%z 4.16 - 6
81.3%z 4.12 - 7
77.8%z 3.99 - 8
71.8%z 3.93 - 9
64.3%z 3.85 - 10
62.9%z 3.83 - 11
62.2%z 3.82 - 12
61.7%z 3.82 - 13
54.6%z 3.74 - 14
47.5%z 3.64 - 15
47.5%z 3.63 - 16
47.1%z 3.61 - 17
45.2%z 3.49 - 18
45.2%z 3.48 - 19
45.1%z 3.48 - 20
45%z 3.47 - 21
44.7%z 3.45 - 22
44.1%z 3.41 - 23
43.9%z 3.40 - 24
43.5%z 3.38 - 25
43.5%z 3.37 - 26
43%z 3.34 - 27
43%z 3.34 - 28
42.8%z 3.33 - 29
42.6%z 3.31 - 30
42.3%z 3.29 - 31
42.2%z 3.29 - 32
42%z 3.27 - 33
41.9%z 3.27 - 34
41.9%z 3.27 - 35
41.2%z 3.23 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
41.1%z 3.22 - 38
40.9%z 3.20 - 39
40.8%z 3.20 - 40
40.7%z 3.20 - 41
40.6%z 3.19 - 42
40.4%z 3.17 - 43
40.2%z 3.16 - 44
40%z 3.15 - 45
39.9%z 3.14 - 46
39.7%z 3.13 - 47
39.7%z 3.13 - 48
39.4%z 3.11 - 49
39%z 3.08 - 50
39%z 3.08