Todd Armstrong: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
83.4%z 4.30 - 2
82.7%z 4.24 - 3
81.4%z 4.13 - 4
80.7%z 4.07 - 5
80.5%z 4.06 - 6
79.5%z 4.01 - 7
72.9%z 3.94 - 8
68%z 3.88 - 9
67.5%z 3.88 - 10
66.5%z 3.87 - 11
57.3%z 3.77 - 12
47.5%z 3.64 - 13
47.1%z 3.61 - 14
46.6%z 3.58 - 15
46.4%z 3.56 - 16
46.3%z 3.56 - 17
45.7%z 3.52 - 18
45.3%z 3.49 - 19
44.8%z 3.46 - 20
44.7%z 3.45 - 21
44.6%z 3.44 - 22
43.7%z 3.39 - 23
43.6%z 3.38 - 24
43.1%z 3.35 - 25
42.9%z 3.34 - 26
42.8%z 3.33 - 27
42.8%z 3.33 - 28
42.8%z 3.33 - 29
42.6%z 3.31 - 30
42.5%z 3.31 - 31
42.4%z 3.31 - 32
42.4%z 3.31 - 33
42.3%z 3.29 - 34
42.1%z 3.29 - 35
42.1%z 3.28 - 36
42.1%z 3.28 - 37
41.8%z 3.27 - 38
41.6%z 3.25 - 39
41.6%z 3.25 - 40
41.6%z 3.25 - 4141.3%z 3.23
- 42
41.2%z 3.23 - 4341.2%z 3.22
- 44
41.1%z 3.22 - 45
41.1%z 3.22 - 46
41%z 3.21 - 47
40.4%z 3.17 - 48
40%z 3.15 - 49
39.9%z 3.14 - 50
39.6%z 3.13