Tomer Heymann: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.7%z 4.48 - 2
82.1%z 4.19 - 3
81.6%z 4.15 - 4
73.1%z 3.94 - 5
68.9%z 3.89 - 6
65.9%z 3.86 - 7
53.2%z 3.72 - 8
53%z 3.72 - 9
46.9%z 3.60 - 10
46.7%z 3.58 - 11
45.1%z 3.48 - 12
44.9%z 3.46 - 13
44.8%z 3.46 - 14
44.6%z 3.45 - 15
44%z 3.41 - 16
43.3%z 3.36 - 17
43.2%z 3.35 - 18
43%z 3.35 - 19
41.4%z 3.24 - 20
41%z 3.21 - 21
39.9%z 3.14 - 22
39.6%z 3.12 - 23
39.5%z 3.12 - 24
39.5%z 3.12 - 25
39.5%z 3.11 - 26
39.5%z 3.11 - 27
39.3%z 3.10 - 28
38.9%z 3.08 - 29
38.9%z 3.07 - 30
38.8%z 3.07 - 31
38.7%z 3.07 - 32
38.6%z 3.06 - 33
38.5%z 3.05 - 34
37.5%z 2.99 - 35
37.1%z 2.96 - 36
37.1%z 2.96 - 37
36.9%z 2.95 - 38
36.9%z 2.95 - 39
36.4%z 2.92 - 40
36.4%z 2.91 - 41
36.4%z 2.91 - 42
36.3%z 2.91 - 43
36.3%z 2.91 - 44
36.2%z 2.90 - 45
36.2%z 2.90 - 46
36.2%z 2.90 - 47
35.9%z 2.88 - 48
35.4%z 2.85 - 49
35.4%z 2.85 - 50
35.4%z 2.85