Ton Koopman: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
90.6%z 4.95 - 2
84.7%z 4.40 - 3
82.7%z 4.23 - 4
81.9%z 4.17 - 5
80.8%z 4.08 - 6
80.5%z 4.06 - 7
80.5%z 4.05 - 8
57%z 3.77 - 9
50.4%z 3.69 - 10
47.8%z 3.65 - 11
46.7%z 3.58 - 12
45.5%z 3.50 - 13
45.3%z 3.49 - 14
45.3%z 3.49 - 15
45.1%z 3.48 - 16
43.9%z 3.40 - 17
43.9%z 3.40 - 18
43.8%z 3.40 - 19
43.5%z 3.38 - 20
43.3%z 3.36 - 21
43.2%z 3.35 - 22
42.9%z 3.34 - 23
42.5%z 3.31 - 24
42.3%z 3.29 - 25
41.9%z 3.27 - 26
41.6%z 3.25 - 27
41.5%z 3.24 - 28
41.3%z 3.24 - 29
41.1%z 3.22 - 30
41.1%z 3.22 - 31
40.3%z 3.17 - 32
40.3%z 3.17 - 33
40%z 3.15 - 34
40%z 3.15 - 35
39.8%z 3.14 - 36
39.8%z 3.13 - 37
39.7%z 3.13 - 38
39.6%z 3.12 - 39
39.6%z 3.12 - 40
39.4%z 3.11 - 41
39.2%z 3.09 - 42
38.9%z 3.08 - 43
38.8%z 3.07 - 44
38.8%z 3.07 - 45
38.7%z 3.06 - 46
38.3%z 3.04 - 47
38.2%z 3.03 - 48
37.8%z 3.01 - 49
37.8%z 3.00 - 50
37.6%z 2.99