Walter Pidgeon: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
85.3%z 4.45 - 2
84.2%z 4.36 - 3
82.5%z 4.22 - 4
82.1%z 4.19 - 5
80.5%z 4.06 - 6
79.5%z 4.01 - 7
79%z 4.01 - 8
78.5%z 4.00 - 9
75.1%z 3.96 - 10
72.4%z 3.93 - 11
71%z 3.92 - 12
64.8%z 3.85 - 13
64.6%z 3.85 - 14
61%z 3.81 - 15
60%z 3.80 - 16
60%z 3.80 - 17
58.2%z 3.78 - 18
56.7%z 3.76 - 19
50.1%z 3.69 - 20
48.6%z 3.67 - 21
48%z 3.66 - 22
47.9%z 3.66 - 23
47.9%z 3.66 - 24
47.7%z 3.65 - 25
47.6%z 3.64 - 26
46.9%z 3.60 - 27
46.9%z 3.60 - 28
46.7%z 3.58 - 29
46.5%z 3.57 - 30
46.4%z 3.56 - 31
46.4%z 3.56 - 32
45.9%z 3.53 - 3345.8%z 3.53
- 34
45.8%z 3.52 - 35
45.5%z 3.50 - 36
45.4%z 3.50 - 37
45.3%z 3.49 - 38
45.2%z 3.48 - 39
45.1%z 3.48 - 40
44.8%z 3.46 - 41
44.7%z 3.46 - 42
44.5%z 3.44 - 43
44.5%z 3.44 - 44
44.4%z 3.44 - 45
44.2%z 3.42 - 4644.1%z 3.42
- 47
44.1%z 3.41 - 48
43.8%z 3.40 - 49
43.7%z 3.39 - 50
43.1%z 3.35