Charles Tannock: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.9%z 4.17 - 2
70.6%z 3.91 - 3
56.3%z 3.76 - 4
55.8%z 3.75 - 5
50.5%z 3.69 - 6
44.6%z 3.44 - 7
44.5%z 3.44 - 8
44.2%z 3.42 - 9
43%z 3.34 - 10
43%z 3.34 - 11
41.8%z 3.27 - 12
41.4%z 3.24 - 13
41.2%z 3.22 - 14
41%z 3.21 - 15
41%z 3.21 - 16
40.8%z 3.20 - 17
40.7%z 3.19 - 18
40.4%z 3.17 - 19
39.5%z 3.11 - 20
39.3%z 3.10 - 21
39.3%z 3.10 - 22
39.2%z 3.10 - 23
39%z 3.09 - 24
38.3%z 3.04 - 25
38.3%z 3.04 - 26
38%z 3.02 - 27
37.9%z 3.02 - 28
37.5%z 2.99 - 29
37.4%z 2.98 - 30
37.3%z 2.97 - 31
37.1%z 2.96 - 32
37.1%z 2.96 - 33
36.9%z 2.95 - 34
36.6%z 2.93 - 35
36.6%z 2.93 - 36
36.5%z 2.92 - 37
36.4%z 2.92 - 38
36.3%z 2.91 - 39
36.3%z 2.91 - 40
36.2%z 2.90 - 41
36.1%z 2.90 - 42
35.9%z 2.88 - 43
35.7%z 2.87 - 44
35.7%z 2.87 - 45
35.5%z 2.86 - 46
35.4%z 2.85 - 47
35.1%z 2.83 - 48
34.6%z 2.80 - 49
34.6%z 2.80 - 50
34.6%z 2.80