David Timm: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
82%z 4.18 - 2
80.2%z 4.03 - 3
71%z 3.92 - 4
64.8%z 3.85 - 5
62.8%z 3.83 - 6
62.3%z 3.82 - 7
58%z 3.78 - 8
51.8%z 3.71 - 9
48.4%z 3.67 - 10
47.3%z 3.62 - 11
46.6%z 3.58 - 12
44.3%z 3.43 - 13
44.1%z 3.41 - 14
43.9%z 3.40 - 15
43.7%z 3.39 - 16
43.2%z 3.36 - 17
43%z 3.34 - 18
42.4%z 3.30 - 19
42.4%z 3.30 - 20
42.2%z 3.29 - 21
42.2%z 3.29 - 22
42%z 3.28 - 23
41.7%z 3.26 - 24
41.7%z 3.26 - 25
41.3%z 3.23 - 26
41%z 3.21 - 27
40.9%z 3.21 - 28
40.7%z 3.19 - 29
40.7%z 3.19 - 30
40.6%z 3.19 - 31
40.5%z 3.18 - 32
40.3%z 3.16 - 33
40%z 3.15 - 34
39.7%z 3.13 - 35
39.5%z 3.12 - 36
39.3%z 3.11 - 37
39.1%z 3.09 - 38
38.8%z 3.07 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
38.5%z 3.05 - 41
38.4%z 3.04 - 42
37.9%z 3.01 - 43
37.6%z 3.00 - 44
37.5%z 2.99 - 45
37.5%z 2.99 - 46
37.5%z 2.99 - 47
37.5%z 2.99 - 48
37.5%z 2.98 - 49
37.3%z 2.97 - 50
37.3%z 2.97