George Sanger: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
88.2%z 4.68 - 2
87.3%z 4.61 - 3
86.9%z 4.58 - 4
81.9%z 4.17 - 5
74.8%z 3.96 - 6
72.9%z 3.94 - 7
65.8%z 3.86 - 8
63.2%z 3.83 - 9
63%z 3.83 - 10
49.6%z 3.68 - 11
48%z 3.66 - 12
47.7%z 3.65 - 13
47.5%z 3.64 - 14
47.5%z 3.63 - 15
47.3%z 3.62 - 16
47.3%z 3.62 - 17
46.6%z 3.58 - 18
46.1%z 3.54 - 19
45.9%z 3.53 - 20
45.7%z 3.52 - 21
45.1%z 3.48 - 22
44.7%z 3.45 - 23
44.3%z 3.43 - 24
44.2%z 3.42 - 25
43.8%z 3.40 - 26
43.3%z 3.36 - 27
43.2%z 3.36 - 28
43%z 3.34 - 29
42.9%z 3.34 - 30
42.9%z 3.34 - 31
42.7%z 3.33 - 32
42.6%z 3.32 - 33
42.5%z 3.31 - 34
42.4%z 3.30 - 35
42.4%z 3.30 - 36
42.4%z 3.30 - 37
42.1%z 3.28 - 38
41.9%z 3.27 - 39
41.9%z 3.27 - 40
41.9%z 3.27 - 41
41.8%z 3.27 - 42
41.5%z 3.24 - 43
41%z 3.21 - 44
40.7%z 3.20 - 45
40.7%z 3.19 - 46
40.7%z 3.19 - 47
40.6%z 3.19 - 48
40.6%z 3.19 - 49
40.3%z 3.17 - 50
40.3%z 3.17