Holden Thorp: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
84%z 4.35 - 2
81.4%z 4.13 - 3
66.4%z 3.87 - 4
53.3%z 3.72 - 5
47.4%z 3.63 - 6
47.4%z 3.63 - 7
47.1%z 3.61 - 8
46.2%z 3.55 - 9
46.2%z 3.55 - 10
45.5%z 3.50 - 11
44.4%z 3.43 - 12
44.1%z 3.42 - 13
44%z 3.41 - 14
43.7%z 3.39 - 15
42.6%z 3.32 - 16
42.6%z 3.32 - 17
42.2%z 3.29 - 18
41.9%z 3.27 - 19
41.7%z 3.26 - 20
41.2%z 3.23 - 21
40.9%z 3.20 - 22
40.6%z 3.19 - 23
40.4%z 3.17 - 24
39.7%z 3.13 - 25
39.5%z 3.12 - 26
39.3%z 3.11 - 27
38.4%z 3.05 - 28
38.2%z 3.03 - 29
38.1%z 3.03 - 30
38%z 3.02 - 31
37.9%z 3.01 - 32
37.9%z 3.01 - 33
37.7%z 3.00 - 34
37.7%z 3.00 - 35
37.6%z 2.99 - 36
36.9%z 2.95 - 37
36.8%z 2.94 - 38
36.8%z 2.94 - 39
36.4%z 2.91 - 40
36.4%z 2.91 - 41
36.3%z 2.91 - 42
36.2%z 2.90 - 43
36.2%z 2.90 - 44
36.1%z 2.90 - 45
36.1%z 2.90 - 46
36.1%z 2.89 - 47
35.8%z 2.88 - 48
35.8%z 2.88 - 49
35.6%z 2.86 - 50
35.3%z 2.85