Hound Dog Taylor: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
96.3%z 6.02 - 2
90.2%z 4.88 - 3
81.2%z 4.11 - 4
80.6%z 4.06 - 5
80%z 4.02 - 6
77.2%z 3.99 - 7
70.6%z 3.91 - 8
69.4%z 3.90 - 9
69.2%z 3.90 - 10
58.9%z 3.79 - 11
49.1%z 3.68 - 12
47.9%z 3.66 - 13
47.3%z 3.62 - 14
46.9%z 3.60 - 15
46.6%z 3.58 - 16
44.5%z 3.44 - 17
44.4%z 3.43 - 18
44.1%z 3.42 - 19
43.6%z 3.38 - 20
43.4%z 3.37 - 21
43.3%z 3.37 - 22
43.3%z 3.36 - 23
43.2%z 3.35 - 24
43%z 3.35 - 25
42.4%z 3.31 - 26
42.2%z 3.29 - 27
42.1%z 3.29 - 28
41.9%z 3.27 - 29
41.9%z 3.27 - 30
41.9%z 3.27 - 31
41.7%z 3.26 - 32
41.6%z 3.25 - 33
41.5%z 3.25 - 34
41.5%z 3.24 - 35
41.4%z 3.24 - 36
41.1%z 3.22 - 37
40.8%z 3.20 - 38
40.6%z 3.19 - 39
40.4%z 3.17 - 40
40.3%z 3.17 - 41
40.3%z 3.17 - 42
40.3%z 3.17 - 43
40.3%z 3.17 - 44
40.1%z 3.15 - 45
39.8%z 3.13 - 46
39.7%z 3.13 - 47
39.7%z 3.13 - 48
39.5%z 3.12 - 49
39.5%z 3.11 - 50
39.5%z 3.11