Thomas Poreski: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
81.8%z 4.16 - 2
65.2%z 3.85 - 3
63.4%z 3.84 - 4
54.5%z 3.74 - 5
53.9%z 3.73 - 6
46.7%z 3.58 - 7
46%z 3.54 - 8
45.7%z 3.51 - 9
45.2%z 3.48 - 10
45%z 3.47 - 11
44.9%z 3.47 - 12
44.7%z 3.45 - 13
44.2%z 3.42 - 14
43.7%z 3.39 - 15
43.1%z 3.35 - 16
42.8%z 3.33 - 17
42.8%z 3.33 - 18
42.8%z 3.33 - 19
42.7%z 3.32 - 20
42.5%z 3.31 - 21
42.4%z 3.30 - 22
42.3%z 3.30 - 23
40.9%z 3.20 - 24
40.7%z 3.19 - 25
40.6%z 3.19 - 26
40.1%z 3.16 - 27
39.9%z 3.14 - 28
39.8%z 3.14 - 29
39.8%z 3.13 - 30
39.5%z 3.12 - 31
39.3%z 3.10 - 32
39.3%z 3.10 - 33
39.1%z 3.09 - 34
39%z 3.08 - 35
39%z 3.08 - 36
38.8%z 3.07 - 37
38.8%z 3.07 - 38
38.7%z 3.07 - 39
38.5%z 3.05 - 40
38.4%z 3.04 - 41
38.3%z 3.04 - 42
38.2%z 3.03 - 43
38.2%z 3.03 - 44
38.1%z 3.02 - 45
38%z 3.02 - 46
37.9%z 3.01 - 47
37.9%z 3.01 - 48
37.8%z 3.01 - 49
37.6%z 3.00 - 50
37.6%z 2.99