Tom Aggar: raw computed results
The raw ranking from the production similarity calculation (face-embedding centroid cosine → gender-cohort z-normalization). The web-opinion crown, curation, and fusion re-rank are removed.
- 1
50.3%z 3.69 - 2
46.4%z 3.57 - 3
44.5%z 3.44 - 4
44.3%z 3.43 - 5
43.8%z 3.39 - 6
43%z 3.34 - 7
42.7%z 3.32 - 8
42.4%z 3.30 - 9
42.2%z 3.29 - 10
41.8%z 3.27 - 11
41.5%z 3.25 - 12
40.5%z 3.18 - 13
40.4%z 3.17 - 14
40.1%z 3.16 - 15
40.1%z 3.16 - 16
40%z 3.15 - 17
39.5%z 3.11 - 18
39.4%z 3.11 - 19
39.3%z 3.10 - 20
39.3%z 3.10 - 21
39.2%z 3.10 - 22
38.7%z 3.06 - 23
38.5%z 3.05 - 24
38.4%z 3.04 - 25
38.2%z 3.03 - 26
37.8%z 3.01 - 27
37.4%z 2.98 - 28
37.3%z 2.97 - 29
37.3%z 2.97 - 30
37.1%z 2.96 - 31
36.9%z 2.95 - 32
36.7%z 2.93 - 33
36.5%z 2.92 - 34
36.4%z 2.92 - 35
36.2%z 2.90 - 36
36.1%z 2.89 - 37
35.9%z 2.89 - 38
35.9%z 2.88 - 39
35.9%z 2.88 - 40
34.5%z 2.79 - 41
34.4%z 2.79 - 42
34.4%z 2.78 - 43
34.2%z 2.77 - 44
34.2%z 2.77 - 45
34.1%z 2.76 - 46
34%z 2.76 - 47
33.9%z 2.75 - 48
33.9%z 2.75 - 49
33.7%z 2.74 - 50
33.7%z 2.74